Second, compose a good response letter to accompany your revised manuscript. Submission Process Dos and don’ts for a great cover letter Read. If the decision letter doesn’t make this clear, go ahead and ask the editor via e-mail. This is particularly appropriate if the critiques were very detailed and highly constructive. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. A sentence along the lines of “All spelling and grammatical errors pointed out by the reviewers have been corrected” suffices.
To repay you, we would be happy to review some manuscripts for you; please send us the next manuscript that any of these reviewers submits to your journal. Submission Process 10 Tips to write an effective cover letter for journal submission … Read. If the decision letter doesn’t make this clear, go ahead and ask the editor via e-mail. Other suggestions were implemented, however, and the paper has improved and benefited. After each comment state succinctly how you addressed the issue in the revision-what was changed and where. If not, then you are an unscrupulous, depraved monster with no shred of human decency. The manuscript may still contain mistakes, but you’ve shown that you’ve done what you can to minimize them.
Submission Process 10 Tips to write an effective cover letter for journal submission … Read. The only common thread was that all 16 were by the same author, presumably someone whom Reviewer B greatly admires and feels should be more widely cited.
Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript | Editage Insights
Second, compose a good response letter to accompany your revised manuscript. Then copy each of the reviewers’ comments into your response letter.
If so, share it with your fellow researchers. Submission Process Dos and don’ts for a great cover letter Read.
Sample Cover Letter for Journal Manuscript Resubmissions – Academia Obscura
I shall skip the usual point-by-point description of every single change we made in response to the critiques. The manuscript may still contain mistakes, but you’ve shown that you’ve done what you can to minimize them. Goldman An experienced journal editor who feels strongly about issues like peer review and is proactive in discussing these issues with authors and others interested in publication. If not, then you are an unscrupulous, depraved monster with no shred of human decency.
Still, from this batch manuscfipt reviewers, C was clearly the most hostile, and we request that you not ask him or her to review this revision. After each comment state succinctly how you addressed the issue in the revision-what was changed resubmisssion where. One click sign-in with your social accounts. You want to show them that you’ve given careful consideration to each comment even if you’ve chosen not to modify the manuscript in response to a particular point.
This content belongs to the Journal Submission Stage. A remark like “We look forward to hearing from you in due time regarding our submission and to respond to any further questions and comments you may have” is a better way to wind up your letter.
If English is not your first language and you’ve engaged a professional to polish up the writing, state this. Hopefully we have suffered enough by now to satisfy even you and your bloodthirsty reviewers. If the decision letter doesn’t make this clear, go ahead and manyscript the editor via e-mail. Dear Sir, Madame, or Other: As you formulate these responses, bear in mind that the reviewers will probably read this letter.
Journal of Educational and Social Research 5 2: This content belongs to the Journal Submission Stage The manuscrupt submission stage can be challenging. Apr 14, It’s not unusual for a contributor to Polar Researchthe journal I edit, to be asked to revise her or his submission three or four times before ldtter finally accepted.
First, if the decision letter doesn’t spell this out, find out if revisions in your submission cofer be highlighted and, if so, whether change-tracking, yellow highlighting or colored text is preferred.
Recent Searches Cover letter Responding to reviewer comments Predatory publishers Research objectives Grant proposal Open access Plagiarism in research Journal selection tips Abstract Difference between thesis and journal article “Reject and Resubmit” status Scope and limitations Citations.
Indeed, we have mailed letter bombs to four or five people we suspected of being reviewer C, so if you send the manuscript back to them the review process could be unduly delayed. If you do accept it, however, we wish to thank you for your patience and wisdom throughout this process and to letetr our appreciation of your scholarly insights. Sign up via email.
Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. This is particularly appropriate if the critiques were very detailed and highly constructive.
We hope that you will be pleased with this revision and will finally recognize how urgently deserving of publication this work is. These were on a variety of different topics, none of which had any relevance to our work that we could see. It’s not necessary to respond individually to each spelling or punctuation mistake, or similar trivial errors, manuuscript the reviewers or the editor indicated on the previous version of the paper.